Internet governance

What is Internet Governance?

While there is no single definition of what Internet Governance (IG) is, one definition is probably most widely referred to:

“Internet governance is the development and application by Governments, the private sector and civil society, in their respective roles, of shared principles, norms, rules, decision-making procedures, and programmes that shape the evolution and use of the Internet.”

This definition was developed in 2005 by the Working Group on Internet Governance (WGIG report), a spin-off working group from the WSIS summit(s) in 2003 and 2005 (more information on WSIS).

Who’s involved?

As the definition shows, IG involves a multitude of actors: public and private actors as well as civil society. Actors include individual governments, inter-governmental organisations (such as the UN and its agencies), international organisations (such as the European Commission, the Council of Europe), multistakeholder organisations (such as ICANN), businesses (such as the content industry, or practically anyone offering Internet services), civil society (such as human rights groups), but also more specific interests, such as the technical community to which CENTR and its members belong.

For an overview of the actors involved in policies and operations related to “the internet”, please refer to this infographic on the “internet ecosystem”.

What do they discuss?

The above-mentioned WGIG also defined a range of public policy issues that matter in IG. To this day, these topics still dominate the agenda of many a meeting today. They were clustered in four categories, including:

  • Infrastructure and management of critical Internet resources (administration of the domain name system (link to DNS) and IP addresses, the root server system, technical standards, etc.)
  • Use of the Internet (spam, network security, cybercrime, etc.)
  • Internet issues with a wider impact (intellectual property rights, international trade)
  • Development of Internet Governance (capacity building in developing countries)

The report then went on to highlight priority issues, which still sound very familiar in today’s debates, inter alia:

  • Unilateral control by the United States Government (i.e. the current IANA Stewardship Transition)
  • Internet stability, security and cybercrime (especially enforcement in cross-border cases)
  • Barriers to multistakeholder participation, e.g. limited participation of those in remote locations
  • Allocation of domain names, especially in view of new gTLDs
  • Intellectual property (the persistent trade-off between the fight against infringements vs. access and use of digital content)
  • Restrictions to the freedom of expression (vs. security measures)
  • Data protection and privacy rights (lack of national legislation and enforceable global standards)

Here are some examples of different organisations' views about internet governance:

Where do they discuss?

The debate around these issues has long moved outside the frame of intergovernmental organisations, such as the UN (ITU, etc). Yet, this also comes as a result of these organisations increasingly integrating a multi-stakeholder component in their processes.

The creation of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF), for example, stems from a mandate issued at the WSIS. It is not only a global forum, but has broken down also into regional forums (such as EuroDIG in Europe ), national (such as the IGF in the Netherlands) or even local IGF initiatives. For more information on the IGF, see CENTR's paper on internet governance and the ITU. Other initiatives, such as Netmundial or the Netmundial Initiative, have also developed over the years.

Since 2006, CENTR has actively participated in the IGF and, together with its members and colleagues from other Regional Organisations, organised workshops.

  • 2015 – Joao Pessao, Brazil - How communities restore trust in the digital environment
  • 2014 – Istanbul, Turkey – ccTLDs: Partners in developing local “IG literacy”
  • 2013 - Bali, Indonesia - The Social Role of a ccTLD, guarantee of everlasting success
  • 2012 - Baku, Azerbeidjan - Around the ccTLDs world, The journey continues
  • 2011 - Nairobi, Kenya - Emerging Issues in the ccTLD ecosystem, the next decade of challenges
  • 2010 - Vilnius, Lithuania - Resilience and contingency planning in the DNS
  • 2009 - Sharm El Sheikh, Egypt - Lost in non-ASCII translation
  • 2008 - Hyderabad, India - Around the world in Eight ccTLDs
  • 2007 - Rio de Janeiro, Brazil - One Size doesn't fit all, 5 models for ccTLD Governance
  • 2007 - Rio de Janeiro, Brazil - The functioning of the Domain Name System
  • 2006 - Athens, Greece - Informal Round Table discussions

Where can I learn more?


Internet ecosystem